|
Home
Group
Home
Reports
Report
1
Report 2
Report 3
Report 4
Individual
Work
Baseline
Statement
FAQ Page
Course
Home
|
State
and Non-State Actors in the Formation and Shaping of Treaty
Regimes
Table of Contents and
Authorship
Sovereign
States (Catherine Hwang)
International Organizations (Almira
Sugatan)
Non-Governmental Organizations (Almira
Sugatan)
National and Multinational
Corporations (Catherine Hwang)
Seeing Patterns of Interaction (Lizbeth
Buriel)
Footnotes (Lizbeth Buriel)
Sovereign
States and Regime Formation [TOP]
As the negotiations began
in 1989 to formulate an international treaty on the issue of
global climate change, the Framework
Convention on Climate Change (FCCC) resulted
in 1992. The Climate Change Convention was opened for
signature at the Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro in 1992, which
the United States had once been the first to ratify,
acknowledging that human activity may be changing the world's
climate systems. At this time, this included legally
non-binding, voluntary pledges that the major industrialized and
developed nations would reduce their greenhouse gas emissions to
1990 levels by the year 2000. However, it was apparent
that major nations such as the United States and Japan, for
example, would not be able to meet the voluntary stabilization
target by the year 2000.
The
inability to meet the reduction expectation was due to the fact
that human activities were having an impact on the whole global
climate systems and could possibly cause a whole Earth warming
affect. It was concluded that this would in
turn, result in a very significant changes in the sea level rise
or the changes in the weather patterns and health effects.
Therefore, it was decided in 1995 to legally bind only those
developed countries and hence, leaving the under-developed
countries to not be affected for the time being. The
United States, the European Union, and Japan are amongst the
more advanced industrialized countries, while the bloc of
developing countries are called "G77 and China" (http://ens-news.com/ens/apr2001/2001L-04-18-06.html).
Negotiations that
eventually led to the Kyoto Conference of the Parties include
significant differences among the developed and developing
countries. The extent of specific reductions and how
flexible the means to achieve these reductions were amongst the
core of the problem between two sides. One of the
arguments sided that the developed countries have caused the
problem by emitting most of the greenhouse gases to date.
The agreement between the two sides brought about the Kyoto
Protocol, which would allow the developing countries to start
cutting pollution at a slower pace than the developed countries.
However, two developing countries, Argentina and Kazakhstan,
have agreed to accept the binding pollution targets.
The result of the 1997 treaty in Kyoto, calls for the developed
countries to cut emissions of 5.2 percent from 1990 levels by
2012, in order to slow down the buildup of heat-trapping
greenhouse gases. 
However, in the recent
months, the United States, who is the world's biggest
polluter, have declared that they now oppose the Kyoto
pact "under any circumstances." The new Bush
administration stated that the reason for rejecting the Kyoto
Protocol was because the result would seriously harm the United
States economy and the developing countries were being unfairly
exempted during the first phase. According to Dutch
Environment Minister, Jan
Pronk, who is also the president of
this ongoing Kyoto Protocol
negotiations, said that all parties but one, the United States,
declared themselves very strongly in favor of the Kyoto Protocol
(http://ens-news.com/ens/apr2001/2001L-04-23-02.html)
International
Organizations and Regimes [TOP]
Some of the International
Organizations that have played a major role in the development
of the United Nations Framework
Convention on Climate Change are United
Nations Environment Program (UNEP) and the World
Meteorological Organization (WMO). Both institutions have
provided the necessary scientific information that opened the
eyes of the world to the growing problem of climate change.
Together, the WMO and UNEP created the IFCC or the Intergovernmental
Panel on Climate Change in 1988. (http://www.ipcc.ch/about/about.htm)
The
World Meteorological Organization was created in 1947 through
the World Meteorological Convention. WMO operates from its
headquarters in Geneva, Switzerland and has 185-member
organizations comprised of 179 Member States and six Member
Territories, all of which maintain their own Meteorological and
Hydrological Services. These organizations provide the
authoritative scientific voice on the state and behavior of the
Earth's atmosphere and climate. WMO created the World Climate
Program (WCP) in 1979 to collect and preserve climate data to
help governments prepare national development plans and
determine their policies in response to the changing climate
situation. The objectives of the WCP are: to use existing
climate information to improve economic and social planning; to
improve the understanding of climate processes through research,
so as to determine the predictability of climate and the extent
of man's influence on it; and to detect and warn governments of
impending climate variations or changes, either natural or
man-made, which may significantly affect critical human
activities. (http://www.wmo.ch/index-en.html)
To asses available information on the science, impacts and the
cross-cutting economic and other issues related to climate
change, WMO and UNEP established the Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change (IPCC) in 1988. In August 1990, the IPCC
completed its first assessment report that indicated with
certainty an increase in the concentration of greenhouse gases
due to human activity. Through this report, governments were
able to make important policy decisions and the implementation
of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change which was
signed by 166 countries at Rio de Janeiro, Brazil in 1992. The
Convention was ratified in December 1993 and entered into force
on March 21, 1994. (http://www.ipcc.ch/about/about.htm)
The IPCC has three working groups and a Task Force:
1. Working Group I assesses the
scientific aspects of the climate system and
climate
change.
2. Working Group II addressees
the vulnerability of socio-economic and
natural
systems to climate change, negative and positive consequences of
climate
change, and options for adapting to it.
3. Working Group III assesses
options for limiting greenhouse gas
emissions
and otherwise mitigating climate change.
4. The Task Force on National
Greenhouse Gas Inventories oversees the
National
Greenhouse Gas Inventories Program.
(http://www.ipcc.ch/about/about.htm)
The IPCC has continued to provide to provide scientific,
technical and socio-economic advice to the world community
through its periodic assessment reports on causes of climate
change, its effects, and the responses needed to minimize the
effects. The Second Assessment Report in 1995 provided key input
to the negotiations, which led to the adoption of the Kyoto
Protocol to the UNFCCC in 1997. (http://www.ipcc.ch/about/about.htm)
Other IGOs
concerned about Climate Change:
UNEP
Information Unit for Conventions (IUC)
Global Environment Facility
International Energy Agency (IEA)
OECD and Climate Change
Non-Governmental
Organizations [TOP]
Currently, almost 400
non-governmental organizations and about 35 intergovernmental
organizations are accredited by UNFCCC. In order to be
accredited as observers, non-governmental organizations must be
legally constituted entities, "not for profit", and
competent in matters related to the Convention. A broad spectrum
of NGOs represent different interests, including environmental
groups, business and industry associations, local governments
and municipal authorities, research and academic institutes,
parliamentarians, labor organizations and religious bodies.
Three main constituency groupings have emerged to facilitate
interaction: Environmental groups; Business and industry
associations; and Local governments and municipal authorities. (www.unfccc.int)
Two of the non-governmental organizations concerned with the
issue of climate change are the Pew Center on Climate Change and
the Center for International Climate and Environmental Research
(CICERO).
CICERO , based in Oslo, was founded by the Norwegian government
in 1990 to conduct research and provide information about issues
of climate change. It has three main areas of research: (1)
impacts of climate changes and climate policy, (2) design of,
implementation of, and compliance with climate policy
instruments, and (3) integrated assessment, that is, the
relationship between climate, other environment issues and
development. (http://www.cicero.uio.no/about/index_e.html)
CICERO keeps other research communities, decision-makers, and
the general public informed about the developments in the
political and scientific arenas involved in climate change. It
also hosts the Climate Forum, where researchers and
representatives from government and business can exchange
information and viewpoints away from the media limelight. (http://www.cicero.uio.no/about/index_e.html)
The Pew Center on Climate Change was established in 1998
by the Pew Charitable Trusts, and is led by former US Assistant
Secretary of State for Oceans and International Environmental
and Scientific Affrairs, Eileen Claussen. The Center's objective
is to educate the public and key policy makers about the causes
and potential consequences of climate change, and to encourage
the domestic and international community to reduce emissions of
greenhouse gases. (http://www.pewclimate.org/about/)
National
and Multinational Corporations [TOP]
During
the past fifteen years, the prospect of global warming from an
increase in greenhouse gases has become one of the most major
issues out in the forefront.
For this very reason, there have been a growing number of
interest among the policymakers and the corporations.
In October of 1993, President Clinton released his
Climate Change Action Plan (CCAP), which
was a proposal of voluntary domestic measures to attain
greenhouse gas emissions stabilization as outlined
under the terms of the UNFCCC.
This plan also includes: partnerships between the
government and private sector; future tax incentives and tax
credits for
companies to be more energy efficient; grants for energy
efficient technology; promotion and funding of research on
energy efficiency and renewable energy technologies through the
U.S. Global Climate Change
Research Program; development of
educational and training programs; and promotion of
diversification of energy sources.
Clinton's action plan, the CCAP, encouraged voluntary
actions by industry, utilities, and other large scale energy
users. CCAP also
emphasized the importance of energy-efficiency and other ways to
improve in generating energy and using technologies more
effectively (http://www.usgerp.gov).
Currently,
most U.S. initiatives are asking for voluntary participation of
state governments and businesses.
So far, twenty-nine states have developed a state-level
GHG inventory and twenty states are committed to developing a
state action plan to reduce GHG.
Not only that, but the Iowa State Energy Bureau's
Building Energy Management Program promotes cost effective
energy management.
In
April, 2001, nearly 300 government and business leaders joined
climate experts and other environmentalists at the Pew
Center conference on Equity and Global Climate Change in
order to discuss how nations can ensure that actions taken to
combat climate change are fair for all.
As mentioned by Robert Hill, Australia's Minister for the
Environment and Heritage, there should be more focus within the
debate for the significant economic opportunity than on the cost
of the Kyoto Protocol. For
businesses, global climate change is a source of risk and
opportunity to be understood and managed (http://www.pewclimate.org).
There
are also other organizations such as The
Global Environmental Management Initiative (GEMI),
which is a nonprofit organization of leading companies dedicated
to fostering environmental, health and safety excellence
worldwide through the sharing of tools and information in order
for business to help business achieve environmental excellence.
Although the problem solving of the global warming issue
will require the economy to cut back on means to advance
forward, some argue that there are policies available to make it
possible for the U.S. to meet the Kyoto goals without negatively
impacting the U.S. economy (http://www.gemi.org).
Patterns
of Leadership and Interaction [TOP]
The World
Meteorological Organization (WMO) and the United
Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) established
the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) in 1988 in
response to an increasing concern over climate change. After the
IPCC assessment reports confirmed that climate change could lead
to serious implications for the world's environment, the United
Nations General Assembly adopted a resolution threat established
the Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee for a Framework
Convention on Climate Change (INC/FCCC). With the support of the
UNEP and the WMO, the mandate of the INC/FCCC began to negotiate
the United Nations Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) between
February 1991 and May of 1992. The UNFCCC was agreed upon in
1992 and went into force on March 21, 1994 (http://www.iisd.ca/climatefcccintro.html).
In order to take action to cut and control
greenhouse emission standards the UNFCCC established different
groups to work together to deal with the issue of climate
change. The Conference
of the Parties (COP) is the supreme
body of the Convention. This group is the highest
decision-making authority. The COP is responsible for keeping
international efforts on track. Among its duties, it reviews the
implementation of the Convention and examines the commitment of
the parties involved. It also reviews new scientific findings
and experience that is gained in implementing climate change.
The COP has met six times and during COP
3 the Kyoto
Protocol was adopted. The UNFCCC also
established a secretariat. The main functions of the secretariat
are to make practical arrangements for sessions of the
Convention bodies, to assist
Parties in implementing their commitments, to provide support to
on-going negotiations. The Convention also established two
standing subsidiary
bodies. They are the Subsidiary
Body for Scientific and Technological Advice (SBSTA) and the
Subsidiary Body for Implementation (SBI). They were created to
give advice to the COP. The SBSTA serves as the link between the
scientific information provided by expert sources and the
policy-oriented needs of the COP. The SBI helps with the
assessment and review of implementation. It examines the National
Communications and Emission
Inventories that are submitted by the parties. The
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change works closely with the
SBSTA and provides expert scientific information. With the
advice of these branches, the COP is able to continue the
on-going negotiation of the convention (http://www.unfccc.de/resource/process/components/institution/sb.html).
The
sixth conference of the parties (COP-6)
met on November 13-25, 2000.
Representatives from 182 governments, 323 intergovernmental and
non-governmental organizations attended this conference. The
goal of this meeting was to reach an agreement on actions to
implement the commitment to reduce emissions of greenhouse
gases that was agreed to under the Kyoto Protocol. It was to
bring to a close more than two ears of preparation and
negotiation set out in the UNFCCC's
Buenos Aires
Plan of Action. Yet despite the
parties willingness for implementation to reduce emissions
levels of greenhouse gases, they were unable to agree to the
terms and actions that would be used enforce it. The
Delegate agreed to suspend COP-6 and reconvene in July of 2001.
People were optimistic that the Kyoto Protocol standards could
be implemented as soon as 2002, but recent development have put
into question the future of the Kyoto Protocol (http://www.iisd.ca/vol12/enb12163e.html).
President Bush recently shocked the
international community by refusing to ratify the treaty because
he believes that it would place economic burden on the United
States, while it demands nothing from developing countries. The
decision by President Bush has drastically affected the
implementation of the Kyoto Protocol. In order to be enforce, it
needs to be ratified by 55 Annex I or developing countries. The
United States
and the European Union were viewed as the leaders of the
ratification of the Kyoto Protocol by Annex I countries. Despite
this setback, the European Commission president, Romano Prodi
agreed that Europe will implement the Kyoto Protocol despite
what the United States does. Ambassadors from several countries
have tried to convince President Bush to reconsider his
position. Now the international community awaits to see the
outcome of the next Conference of the Parties which will
reconvene in July and how the United States decision will affect
the implementation of the Kyoto Protocol (http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/sci/tech/newsid_1263000/1263888.stm).
Footnotes
[TOP]
"About
CICERO". http://www.cicero.uio.no/about/index_e.html
(7 May 2001)
"About
IPCC". http://www.ipcc.ch/about/about.htm
(7 May 2001).
"About
the Pew Center". http://www.pewclimate.org/about/
(7 May 2001).
"A
Brief Introduction to the UN Framework Convention on Climate
Change (UNFCCC)". http://www.iisd.ca/climate/fcccintro.html
(29 April 2001).
"Basic
Facts about WMO". http://www.wmo.ch/index-en.html
(7 May 2001).
"The
Conference of the Parties". Guide to the Climate Change
Negotiation Process. http://www.unfccc.de/resource/process/components/institutioin/cop.html
(29 April 2001).
Kirby,
Alex. "Prodi 'shocked' by Bush climate stand".
BBC News. http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/sci/tech/newsid_1263000/1263888.stm
(7 May 2001).
"Observers".
Guide to the Climate Change Negotiation Process. http://www.unfccc.int/resource/process/components/participants/observ.html
(7 May 2001).
"The
Subsidiary Bodies". Guide to the Climate Change Negotiation
Process. http://www.unfccc.de/resource/process/components/institution/sb.html
(29 April 2001).
"Summary
of the Sixth Conference of the Parties to the Framework
Convention on Climate Change: 13-25 November 2000"
Earth Negotiations Bulletin. 27 November 2000. http://www.iisd.ca/vol12/enb12163e.html
(7 May 2001).
|