|
|
Non-State Actors in International Law: A Case Study |
|
| Internal
Links:
External Links: |
TABLE
OF CONTENTS: I.
A Summary Overview of the Role of Non-State Actors
(by
Eduardo Aguilar)
II. International Program of a Non-State Actor: A Case Study (by Sophia Aritsakis) III. International Participation: Extent and Impacts IV. Endnotes I. A Summary Overview of the Role of Non-State Actors Within
the current system of international environmental law, the
role of non-governmental organizations (NGO's) has increasingly become
more and more crucial. In today's realm of international law, we
find that more and more NGO's are taking it upon themselves to advocate
changes within the global community. The strongest weapon in the NGO
arsenal is that of public opinion and political influence.
Armed with these and a few more tactics the NGO's have witnessed their
ascension in the world of international politics and policy making. The
main role that the NGO's serve in today's system of international law is
that of networking
between the various NGO's, the various states and also between the
concerned public. The NGO's capacity to build networks, gather and
analyze technical information, and their What is undeniable . . . is
that environmentalists, far more than any other nongovernmental community
except, perhaps, human rights activists, have forced their way into the
previously closed rooms of international diplomacy. Even if their
policies are not adopted, they are there, placing their position papers on
the table and speaking out, not just in the corridors but in the once
sacrosanct plenary halls and in the small, out-of-the-way chambers where
deals are hammered out in secret.[2]
Aside from providing the medium through which environmental
issues can be voiced through, NGO's also serve in the background of
international law by providing important analytical support for government
officials and policymakers.[3]
This support includes anything from conducting and analyzing research into
the issue to II. International Program of a Non-State Actor: A Case Study In
order to illustrate the role non-state actors play in international law,
we have chosen to take a look at The Greenpeace Organization. As a global
organization, Greenpeace focuses on the most crucial worldwide threats to
our planet's biodiversity and environment.
Greenpeace is a non-profit organisation, with a presence in 40
countries across Europe, the Americas, Asia and the Pacific.[5]
In order to maintain its independence, Greenpeace does not accept
donations from governments or corporations, funding depends on
contributions from individual supporters and foundation grants.[6]
This ensures that the agenda of the organization maintains focused
on the preservation of the environment.
Greenpeace is an active participant in the campaign to stop ozone
depletion and has been an avid supporter of the Montreal Protocol.
The
Greenpeace Organization is involved in many Currently, Greenpeace is campaigning worldwide for a global ban on the production and use of ozone depleting substances. The organization believes that this measure must be taken to preserve the health and environment of present and future generations of life. The campaign is based on the following interconnected components: scientific information, technological development corporate campaigning, international campaigning, campaigns to industrialized countries, public empowerment.[9] The organization has been successful in finding alternative substances to ozone depleting chemicals that are cost efficient as well as environmentally safe. III. International Participation: Extent and Impacts (A)
Extent:The
Greenpeace Organization is extensively involved in the affairs of the
Montreal Protocol Regime. The
campaign closely monitors regulatory and economic developments regarding
control of ODSs within the regime, the World Bank, the Multilateral Fund,
the European Commission, and national governments.[10]
Representatives of the Greenpeace Organization regularly attend all
conferences of the Parties as well as any other relative meeting.
In addition, representatives of Greenpeace engage in letter writing The Greenpeace Organization boasts observer and intervening status at the Montreal Protocol’s Multilateral Fund and World Bank Meetings.[12] The Organization applies pressure to national governments and multinational corporations for effective national measures to ban ODSs. This pressure is exerted through direct action in partnership with other parties and through public campaigns. Greenpeace empowers the public with scientific and technological information, which urges the public to demand measures to protect the ozone layer from their governments and industry.[13] Since Greenpeace is funded strictly through donations and grants its campaigns are not committed to other interests other than the environment which has proved quite effective. (B)
Impact: One of the biggest impacts that NGO's can have
on the system of international law is that of providing a means
through which people can communicate and address the issues at hand.
In this sense Greenpeace
International has been very effective in Along with providing a platform for its members to get involved in the policymaking process, Greenpeace has also been able to address the issue directly at several international conferences on the issue of ozone depletion (i.e.: the Greenpeace International: 8th meeting of the parties to the Montreal Protocol, at which John Maté addressed those involved in the Montreal Protocol). The scientific evidence presented by Maté's speech helped solidify and legitimize his argument. [1] David Hunter, James Salzman, & Durwood Zaelke, International Environmental Law and Policy, 2nd ed., (Foundation Press, New York, 2002), 291. [2] David Hunter, James Salzman, & Durwood Zaelke, International Environmental Law and Policy, 2nd ed., (Foundation Press, New York, 2002), 291. [3] David Hunter, James Salzman, & Durwood Zaelke, International Environmental Law and Policy, 2nd ed., (Foundation Press, New York, 2002), 291. [4] David Hunter, James Salzman, & Durwood Zaelke, International Environmental Law and Policy, 2nd ed., (Foundation Press, New York, 2002), 291. [11] id [12] id
|
|
|
Last Revised |
Copyright © Eduardo Aguilar 2003. All federal and state copyrights reserved for all original material presented in this course through any medium, including lecture or print. |